Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of royalty and the cost of advertisement incurred by the Appellant in India in assessable value - related party - The Tribunal allowed the appeals, stating that the royalty payments related to the licensed products could not be added to the transaction value of imported goods as they did not satisfy the conditions laid out in the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Similarly, it held that advertisement expenses were post-import activities and should not be included in the transaction value. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of a direct relationship between the appellant and suppliers under the related persons' definition, affecting the valuation of imported goods.
Valuation of imported goods - inclusion of royalty and the cost of advertisement incurred by the Appellant in India in assessable value - related party - The Tribunal allowed the appeals, stating that the royalty payments related to the licensed products could not be added to the transaction value of imported goods as they did not satisfy the conditions laid out in the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Similarly, it held that advertisement expenses were post-import activities and should not be included in the transaction value. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of a direct relationship between the appellant and suppliers under the related persons' definition, affecting the valuation of imported goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.