Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant's activities do not fall under "Business Auxiliary Services" as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.
Levy of Service tax - Business auxiliary service - commission retained/earned towards the service rendered by them to the co-GSA/IATA - The Tribunal finds that the appellant's activities do not fall under "Business Auxiliary Services" as alleged by the revenue. It determines that the appellants act as principal-to-principal in their transactions and do not serve as commission agents for other GSA/IATA operators. - Further, the Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument that it was issued beyond the prescribed period and finds no evidence of suppression or intent to evade tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.