Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of reopening of assessment - doctrine of merger - The ITAT unequivocally quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant for the Assessment Year 2006-07, ruling them as bad-in-law due to the procedural flaw of issuing a notice under section 147 beyond the four-year period without specifying the particulars of omitted income - The judgment also indirectly supports the appellant's contention regarding the classification of certain incomes as business incomes eligible for section 80IA deductions, though this specific issue became moot following the quashing of the reassessment order.
Validity of reopening of assessment - doctrine of merger - The ITAT unequivocally quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant for the Assessment Year 2006-07, ruling them as bad-in-law due to the procedural flaw of issuing a notice under section 147 beyond the four-year period without specifying the particulars of omitted income - The judgment also indirectly supports the appellant's contention regarding the classification of certain incomes as business incomes eligible for section 80IA deductions, though this specific issue became moot following the quashing of the reassessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
