ITAT quashes reassessment beyond four years for section 80IA deduction due to doctrine of merger

The ITAT Chennai quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years for deduction under section 80IA. The Tribunal held that the issue had attained finality through doctrine of merger, as the CIT(A)'s order was confirmed by the Tribunal and HC did not admit revenue's appeal. The AO failed to establish reasons based on tangible material indicating income escapement and did not record that the assessee failed to disclose material facts necessary for assessment beyond four years. The reopening was merely based on revenue audit objection without fulfilling mandatory conditions. The assessment order was accordingly quashed as bad-in-law.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of Reopening of Assessment
2. Quantum Addition on Merits

Summary:

1. Validity of Reopening of Assessment:

The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment u/s 147, arguing it was beyond the 4-year limit and lacked tangible new material. The original assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 26-10-2008, and the reopening notice was issued on 08-03-2013. The assessee contended that all necessary particulars were disclosed during the initial assessment, and the reopening was merely a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer (AO). The CIT(A) upheld the reopening, citing an audit objection as a valid reason for reassessment. However, the ITAT found that no new tangible material was presented to justify the reopening and that it was based solely on an audit objection, which is insufficient for reassessment beyond 4 years. The ITAT also noted that the original appellate order had attained finality and revisiting it would disturb the concluded issue.

2. Quantum Addition on Merits:

The assessee disputed the disallowance of Rs. 3,06,39,429/- u/s 80IA, arguing that items like liquidated damages reversed, provision for warranty reversed, amounts written-back, and sale of scrap are business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA. The CIT(A) rejected this claim, relying on the decision in Liberty India Ltd vs CIT (317 ITR 218), which held that such income does not qualify for deduction u/s 80IA. The ITAT did not delve into the merits of this issue, as the reassessment proceedings themselves were found invalid.

Conclusion:

The ITAT concluded that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to the lack of new tangible material and the fact that the reopening was based solely on an audit objection. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed. The merits of the quantum addition were rendered academic and not addressed.

Order Pronounced:

The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 13th March, 2024.

---