Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.
Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
