<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules No Service PE in India for 2020-22 Under India-Singapore DTAA; Virtual PE Claim Dismissed for Lack of Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75790</link>
    <description>Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:53:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules No Service PE in India for 2020-22 Under India-Singapore DTAA; Virtual PE Claim Dismissed for Lack of Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75790</link>
      <description>Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:53:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>