Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.
Accrual of income India - Service PE/ virtual service PE in India - computation of threshold date for constitution of service PE - The tribunal concluded that for AY 2020-21, the appellant did not constitute a Service PE in India, as the presence of employees in India did not exceed the 90-day threshold required for constituting a Service PE under the India-Singapore DTAA. For AY 2021-22, since no employees visited India, the appellant could not have constituted a Service PE. Furthermore, the tribunal found no basis for the constitution of a Virtual Service PE as claimed by the AO, given the absence of relevant provisions in the India-Singapore DTAA or substantial evidence to support such a claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
