Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
TDS u/s 194I or 194IB - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS was deducted but the section 194IB was mentioned wrongly instead of section 194I(b) - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, finding that tax had indeed been deducted at source on rental expenditure. However, the claim for a refund of excess DDT was dismissed based on legal precedent.
TDS u/s 194I or 194IB - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS was deducted but the section 194IB was mentioned wrongly instead of section 194I(b) - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, finding that tax had indeed been deducted at source on rental expenditure. However, the claim for a refund of excess DDT was dismissed based on legal precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.