<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Supports Assessee on TDS Disallowance; Rejects Excess Dividend Distribution Tax Refund Claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75684</link>
    <description>TDS u/s 194I or 194IB - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS was deducted but the section 194IB was mentioned wrongly instead of section 194I(b) - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, finding that tax had indeed been deducted at source on rental expenditure. However, the claim for a refund of excess DDT was dismissed based on legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:43:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:43:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Supports Assessee on TDS Disallowance; Rejects Excess Dividend Distribution Tax Refund Claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75684</link>
      <description>TDS u/s 194I or 194IB - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS was deducted but the section 194IB was mentioned wrongly instead of section 194I(b) - The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, finding that tax had indeed been deducted at source on rental expenditure. However, the claim for a refund of excess DDT was dismissed based on legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:43:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>