Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Advance Authorisation Scheme - Non-fulfilment of Export Obligation - fraudulent activities - allegation of collusion with the Customs officials - The CESTAT examined the allegations against the appellant and the findings of the adjudicating authority. It noted that while the adjudicating authority implicated the appellant in fraudulent activities, there was a lack of concrete evidence supporting these allegations. Furthermore, the court observed that the involvement of customs officers, mentioned in the proceedings, was not substantiated with adequate details or evidence. Consequently, the court found that the penalties imposed on the appellant lacked a legal basis.
Advance Authorisation Scheme - Non-fulfilment of Export Obligation - fraudulent activities - allegation of collusion with the Customs officials - The CESTAT examined the allegations against the appellant and the findings of the adjudicating authority. It noted that while the adjudicating authority implicated the appellant in fraudulent activities, there was a lack of concrete evidence supporting these allegations. Furthermore, the court observed that the involvement of customs officers, mentioned in the proceedings, was not substantiated with adequate details or evidence. Consequently, the court found that the penalties imposed on the appellant lacked a legal basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
