Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction's genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.
Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction's genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
