<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST Demand Discrepancy Over ITC: Court Quashes Assessment Order, Allows Contest; Petitioner to Pay 10% of Disputed Tax.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75663</link>
    <description>Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction&#039;s genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:51:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST Demand Discrepancy Over ITC: Court Quashes Assessment Order, Allows Contest; Petitioner to Pay 10% of Disputed Tax.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75663</link>
      <description>Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity between the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed in the GSTR-3B return and that reflected in the auto-populated GSTR-2A returns. It noted that the transaction&#039;s genuineness was not in question. - Acknowledging the contention regarding non-adherence to applicable circulars, the court deemed it appropriate to provide the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand. - The court quashed the impugned assessment order with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:51:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>