Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 11, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant's mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant's status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority's order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant's status as a secured creditor.
CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant's mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant's status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority's order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant's status as a secured creditor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
