<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Confirms Secured Creditor Status for Appellant Despite Non-Registered Charge, Overturning Prior Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75585</link>
    <description>CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant&#039;s mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant&#039;s status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant&#039;s status as a secured creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Confirms Secured Creditor Status for Appellant Despite Non-Registered Charge, Overturning Prior Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75585</link>
      <description>CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant&#039;s mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant&#039;s status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant&#039;s status as a secured creditor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>