Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 11, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant's mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant's status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority's order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant's status as a secured creditor.
CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation Estate or not - The tribunal recognized the appellant's mortgage rights, stating that non-registration of the mortgage under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not invalidate the appellant's status as a secured creditor. It emphasized the rights of a mortgagee under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the SARFAESI Act, 2002, should not be diluted by regulatory provisions introduced later. - The tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority's order, which had classified the appellant as an unsecured creditor, and recognized the appellant's status as a secured creditor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
