Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.
Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
