<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Summoning Order Against Woman in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Involvement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75530</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:24:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:24:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Summoning Order Against Woman in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Involvement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75530</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:24:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>