Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.
Dishonour of Cheque - Seeking setting aside of summoning order - vicarious liability on partner of a firm - The name of the petitioner is conspicuously not mentioned as an accused or a person responsible for the affairs of the said partnership firm. - The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a 65-year-old lady, accused in a case involving cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on grounds of insufficient evidence of her involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the partnership firm accused of issuing the bounced cheques.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
