Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Levy of penalty - Non-production of e-way bill in time due certain difficulties - intention to evade tax (mens rea) - The High Court emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to demonstrate no intention to evade tax. - Despite the subsequent production of documents, the petitioner fails to provide a reasonable explanation for their absence at the proper time. - The court notes that the difficulties with generating e-way bills were resolved after April 2018, and the petitioner's arguments are not supported by the facts. - The court dismisses the writ petition, affirming the validity of the actions taken by the respondent authorities.
Levy of penalty - Non-production of e-way bill in time due certain difficulties - intention to evade tax (mens rea) - The High Court emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to demonstrate no intention to evade tax. - Despite the subsequent production of documents, the petitioner fails to provide a reasonable explanation for their absence at the proper time. - The court notes that the difficulties with generating e-way bills were resolved after April 2018, and the petitioner's arguments are not supported by the facts. - The court dismisses the writ petition, affirming the validity of the actions taken by the respondent authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
