<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Missing E-Way Bill; Petitioner Fails to Prove No Tax Evasion Intent Despite Providing Documents Later.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75421</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - Non-production of e-way bill in time due certain difficulties - intention to evade tax (mens rea) - The High Court emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to demonstrate no intention to evade tax. - Despite the subsequent production of documents, the petitioner fails to provide a reasonable explanation for their absence at the proper time. - The court notes that the difficulties with generating e-way bills were resolved after April 2018, and the petitioner&#039;s arguments are not supported by the facts. - The court dismisses the writ petition, affirming the validity of the actions taken by the respondent authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 17:26:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 17:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Missing E-Way Bill; Petitioner Fails to Prove No Tax Evasion Intent Despite Providing Documents Later.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75421</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - Non-production of e-way bill in time due certain difficulties - intention to evade tax (mens rea) - The High Court emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the petitioner to demonstrate no intention to evade tax. - Despite the subsequent production of documents, the petitioner fails to provide a reasonable explanation for their absence at the proper time. - The court notes that the difficulties with generating e-way bills were resolved after April 2018, and the petitioner&#039;s arguments are not supported by the facts. - The court dismisses the writ petition, affirming the validity of the actions taken by the respondent authorities.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 17:26:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>