Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - period of limitation - The ITAT Delhi found the final assessment order dated 30.06.2022 to be barred by limitation. It was established that the directions from the DRP were uploaded to the ITBA portal on 07.04.2022, contrary to the claim of the AO that they were made known only on 02.05.2022. Accordingly, the AO was required to pass the final assessment order by 31.05.2022, making the actual order passed on 30.06.2022 out of time.
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - period of limitation - The ITAT Delhi found the final assessment order dated 30.06.2022 to be barred by limitation. It was established that the directions from the DRP were uploaded to the ITBA portal on 07.04.2022, contrary to the claim of the AO that they were made known only on 02.05.2022. Accordingly, the AO was required to pass the final assessment order by 31.05.2022, making the actual order passed on 30.06.2022 out of time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.