Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final assessment order was barred by limitation under section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions were uploaded in the faceless assessment system on an earlier date and later transferred internally to the assessment unit.
Analysis: The time limit under section 144C(13) begins from the receipt of the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions. In the faceless assessment framework, communications are routed through the National Faceless Assessment Centre, and the time and place of dispatch and receipt of electronic records are governed by section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. On a combined reading of sections 130 and 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, upload of the directions on the portal constituted dispatch and receipt on the same date. Internal retention by the faceless centre and later transmission to the assessment unit did not extend the statutory period.
Conclusion: The final assessment order was time-barred and the limitation objection was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In faceless assessment proceedings, receipt of the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions occurs when they are uploaded on the designated electronic system, and the limitation period under section 144C(13) runs from that date, not from any later internal transmission within the department.