Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with Section 49 of the NDPS Act - The defense raised several points highlighting failures and contradictions in the prosecution's evidence - The admissibility of confessions recorded by police officers was questioned, as it is in violation of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. - The Supreme Court acquitted the accused appellants of all charges, citing the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and highlighting the flaws in the evidence presented.
Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with Section 49 of the NDPS Act - The defense raised several points highlighting failures and contradictions in the prosecution's evidence - The admissibility of confessions recorded by police officers was questioned, as it is in violation of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. - The Supreme Court acquitted the accused appellants of all charges, citing the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and highlighting the flaws in the evidence presented.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
