<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Drug Case Due to Flawed Evidence and Inadmissible Confessions Under NDPS Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75371</link>
    <description>Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with Section 49 of the NDPS Act - The defense raised several points highlighting failures and contradictions in the prosecution&#039;s evidence - The admissibility of confessions recorded by police officers was questioned, as it is in violation of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. - The Supreme Court acquitted the accused appellants of all charges, citing the prosecution&#039;s failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and highlighting the flaws in the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:53:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Drug Case Due to Flawed Evidence and Inadmissible Confessions Under NDPS Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75371</link>
      <description>Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with Section 49 of the NDPS Act - The defense raised several points highlighting failures and contradictions in the prosecution&#039;s evidence - The admissibility of confessions recorded by police officers was questioned, as it is in violation of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. - The Supreme Court acquitted the accused appellants of all charges, citing the prosecution&#039;s failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and highlighting the flaws in the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 09:53:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>