Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Parity in bail and documentary evidence supported release where no custodial remand was sought.
    Section 129 timelines are directory, not mandatory; delayed detention proceedings survive, while goods may be released on penalty deposit.
    Writ jurisdiction can condone delay in a statutory appeal when statutory limitation would cause grave prejudice.
    Writ jurisdiction and judicial restraint upheld: refusal to issue mandamus in disputed tax evasion allegations sustained.
    Summary processing cannot disallow a debatable ESI and EPF deduction claim under prima facie adjustment.
    Make available test under India-UK DTAA: intra-group support services were not fees for technical services.
    Vague reasons for reopening beyond four years cannot replace recorded failure to disclose material facts; reassessment notice quashed.
    Registered sale deed and banking evidence supported capital gains reinvestment claim; unexplained money additions were deleted.
    Unsigned transfer pricing order held non est in law, leading to quashing of the assessments.
    ITAT on revenue recognition, notional interest, and business deductions: verified claims, no exempt-income disallowance, and selective remands.
    Invalid scrutiny notice, earlier transfer of property, and mercantile accrual rule led ITAT to delete additions and quash assessment.
    Agricultural income from leased land, genuine trade liabilities, and no cessation of liability were upheld in this tax dispute.
    Section 80P business attribution: ITAT allows deduction on investment interest and ancillary receipts, but excludes staff-loan and other non-eligible ...
    Business expenditure on discontinued operations allowed despite slump sale valuation having no bearing on section 37(1) deductibility.
    Weighted deduction for donation to approved research institution sustained despite unproven allegations of donee-side fraud
    IGST classification and limitation: residual entry demand fails where self-assessment was not challenged and suppression was not proved.
    High Seas Sale of Technical Grade Urea through State Trading Enterprise did not justify confiscation or penalty.
    Repeated default and statutory adjournment limits justified dismissal for non-prosecution under tribunal procedure rules.
    Fraudulent CIRP allegations need specific material; Section 65 cannot reopen admitted debt and default findings.
    Pre-existing dispute defeats insolvency claim where wage dues remain under labour and court proceedings.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during...

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Drug Case Due to Flawed Evidence and Inadmissible Confessions Under NDPS Act.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws March 4, 2024 Case Laws SC
Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with Section 49 of the NDPS Act - The defense raised several points highlighting failures and contradictions in the prosecution's evidence - The admissibility of confessions recorded by police officers was questioned, as it is in violation of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. - The Supreme Court acquitted the accused appellants of all charges, citing the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and highlighting the flaws in the evidence presented.

Topics

Acts Income Tax