Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents were submitted to prove the legitimacy of the transaction. The addition under section 68 was reversed, and the AO was directed to delete the same. However, the addition under section 2(22)(e) was upheld, as the Assessee failed to provide substantial evidence to support the contention that the loan from M/s KAJ Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. was for business purposes.
Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans Addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Deemed dividend - The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's submissions, noting that all relevant documents were submitted to prove the legitimacy of the transaction. The addition under section 68 was reversed, and the AO was directed to delete the same. However, the addition under section 2(22)(e) was upheld, as the Assessee failed to provide substantial evidence to support the contention that the loan from M/s KAJ Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. was for business purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
