Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically expire due to the lapse of time. Fundamental principles of natural justice require that any modification or vacation of such orders must occur through judicial examination, ensuring fairness to all parties involved. - The Court highlighted that while Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for doing complete justice, it cannot be used to annul lawful judicial orders en masse without considering individual case merits and the rights of those not present before the Court.
Automatic Vacation of the interim order / Stay Order after six months - judicial legislation or not - The Supreme Court held that interim orders cannot automatically expire due to the lapse of time. Fundamental principles of natural justice require that any modification or vacation of such orders must occur through judicial examination, ensuring fairness to all parties involved. - The Court highlighted that while Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for doing complete justice, it cannot be used to annul lawful judicial orders en masse without considering individual case merits and the rights of those not present before the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
