Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant's claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.
CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant's claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
