<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eviction Ordered: Tribunal Denies Possessory Rights Due to Unfulfilled Obligations; Appeals Dismissed, Possession Affirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75310</link>
    <description>CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant&#039;s claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eviction Ordered: Tribunal Denies Possessory Rights Due to Unfulfilled Obligations; Appeals Dismissed, Possession Affirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75310</link>
      <description>CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant&#039;s claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 07:31:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>