Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant's claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.
CIRP - Eviction of the Appellant from the property - handing over the possession of the property in question to the RP (now Liquidator) within 15 days from the passing of the order and the Statutory Authorities i.e. Local Police - The tribunal dismissed the Appellant's claim for protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as the Appellant did not fulfill his part of the contract, rendering him ineligible for possessory rights over the property. - The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal found no merit in the arguments presented by the Appellant and affirmed the possession of the property in question to be with the Corporate Debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
