Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Jurisdiction - powers of AO to re-assess the escape turnover - Power of suo moto revision. - The High court found that the respondent No. 3 (Additional Commissioner of Taxes) exceeded his jurisdiction by revising the assessment orders without conclusively determining that the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue based on existing records. - The court also noted the anomaly where the revision under Section 20 of the Nagaland Act also covered aspects under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which was beyond the jurisdiction of the respondent No. 3 under the said Section. - Revision orders quashed.
Jurisdiction - powers of AO to re-assess the escape turnover - Power of suo moto revision. - The High court found that the respondent No. 3 (Additional Commissioner of Taxes) exceeded his jurisdiction by revising the assessment orders without conclusively determining that the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue based on existing records. - The court also noted the anomaly where the revision under Section 20 of the Nagaland Act also covered aspects under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which was beyond the jurisdiction of the respondent No. 3 under the said Section. - Revision orders quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
