<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Revision Orders Quashed for Jurisdiction Overreach and Misapplication of Central Sales Tax Act Provisions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75225</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction - powers of AO to re-assess the escape turnover - Power of suo moto revision. - The High court found that the respondent No. 3 (Additional Commissioner of Taxes) exceeded his jurisdiction by revising the assessment orders without conclusively determining that the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue based on existing records. - The court also noted the anomaly where the revision under Section 20 of the Nagaland Act also covered aspects under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which was beyond the jurisdiction of the respondent No. 3 under the said Section. - Revision orders quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:34:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Revision Orders Quashed for Jurisdiction Overreach and Misapplication of Central Sales Tax Act Provisions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75225</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction - powers of AO to re-assess the escape turnover - Power of suo moto revision. - The High court found that the respondent No. 3 (Additional Commissioner of Taxes) exceeded his jurisdiction by revising the assessment orders without conclusively determining that the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue based on existing records. - The court also noted the anomaly where the revision under Section 20 of the Nagaland Act also covered aspects under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which was beyond the jurisdiction of the respondent No. 3 under the said Section. - Revision orders quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:34:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>