Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.
Levy of penalty - no E-Way Bill, invoice and bilty were present in the vehicle carrying the goods - onus to prove (shifting burden) - The High court held that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of tax evasion since they could not explain the absence of the invoice and E-Way Bill. Thus, the penalty imposed is upheld, emphasizing that penalties act as deterrents to tax evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
