Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Taxability of salary income in India while rendering service in abroad - assessee is NRI - income accrued inside or outside India - assessee is a non-resident employee in an Indian Company IBM India Pvt. Ltd. and was sent abroad to UK for rendering services there and service was rendered in UK though the appointment made in India - The ITAT held that the assessee, being a non-resident, qualified for tax treatment u/s 5(2)(b) of the Act.
Taxability of salary income in India while rendering service in abroad - assessee is NRI - income accrued inside or outside India - assessee is a non-resident employee in an Indian Company IBM India Pvt. Ltd. and was sent abroad to UK for rendering services there and service was rendered in UK though the appointment made in India - The ITAT held that the assessee, being a non-resident, qualified for tax treatment u/s 5(2)(b) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.