Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured and used in manufacture/rendering of services to the test of eligibility once again - deletion of rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 31st March 2011 - The Tribunal emphasizes that the deletion of rule 6(5) does not affect the validity of credit availed under rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, at the time of procurement of services. - It concludes that the appellant's entitlement to credit cannot be curtailed or impacted by the deletion of rule 6(5), and the impugned order is not sustainable.
Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured and used in manufacture/rendering of services to the test of eligibility once again - deletion of rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 31st March 2011 - The Tribunal emphasizes that the deletion of rule 6(5) does not affect the validity of credit availed under rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, at the time of procurement of services. - It concludes that the appellant's entitlement to credit cannot be curtailed or impacted by the deletion of rule 6(5), and the impugned order is not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
