<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Credit Entitlement Unaffected by Rule Deletion; Tribunal Upholds Validity of CENVAT Credit Previously Availed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75093</link>
    <description>Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured and used in manufacture/rendering of services to the test of eligibility once again - deletion of rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 31st March 2011 - The Tribunal emphasizes that the deletion of rule 6(5) does not affect the validity of credit availed under rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, at the time of procurement of services. - It concludes that the appellant&#039;s entitlement to credit cannot be curtailed or impacted by the deletion of rule 6(5), and the impugned order is not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Credit Entitlement Unaffected by Rule Deletion; Tribunal Upholds Validity of CENVAT Credit Previously Availed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75093</link>
      <description>Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured and used in manufacture/rendering of services to the test of eligibility once again - deletion of rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 with effect from 31st March 2011 - The Tribunal emphasizes that the deletion of rule 6(5) does not affect the validity of credit availed under rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, at the time of procurement of services. - It concludes that the appellant&#039;s entitlement to credit cannot be curtailed or impacted by the deletion of rule 6(5), and the impugned order is not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:19:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>