Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revocation of Customs Broker License - Deemed revocation - The tribunal observed that, the the appellants had performed due diligence in verifying the exporter's details as required under Regulation 10(n). - The ineligible claim for export incentives was found by the department only on the basis of specific investigation conducted by the NSPU/R&I customs authorities, and hence the appellants CB cannot be found fault for the reason that they did not advise their client importer to comply with the provisions of the Act. - The Tribunal held that, the procedure outlined in Regulation 17 for revoking a license or imposing a penalty was not followed correctly, particularly regarding the opportunity for cross-examination. -
Revocation of Customs Broker License - Deemed revocation - The tribunal observed that, the the appellants had performed due diligence in verifying the exporter's details as required under Regulation 10(n). - The ineligible claim for export incentives was found by the department only on the basis of specific investigation conducted by the NSPU/R&I customs authorities, and hence the appellants CB cannot be found fault for the reason that they did not advise their client importer to comply with the provisions of the Act. - The Tribunal held that, the procedure outlined in Regulation 17 for revoking a license or imposing a penalty was not followed correctly, particularly regarding the opportunity for cross-examination. -
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
