<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Overturns Customs Broker License Revocation Due to Procedural Flaws in Investigation and Due Diligence Compliance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75063</link>
    <description>Revocation of Customs Broker License - Deemed revocation - The tribunal observed that, the the appellants had performed due diligence in verifying the exporter&#039;s details as required under Regulation 10(n). - The ineligible claim for export incentives was found by the department only on the basis of specific investigation conducted by the NSPU/R&amp;I customs authorities, and hence the appellants CB cannot be found fault for the reason that they did not advise their client importer to comply with the provisions of the Act. - The Tribunal held that, the procedure outlined in Regulation 17 for revoking a license or imposing a penalty was not followed correctly, particularly regarding the opportunity for cross-examination. </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Overturns Customs Broker License Revocation Due to Procedural Flaws in Investigation and Due Diligence Compliance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75063</link>
      <description>Revocation of Customs Broker License - Deemed revocation - The tribunal observed that, the the appellants had performed due diligence in verifying the exporter&#039;s details as required under Regulation 10(n). - The ineligible claim for export incentives was found by the department only on the basis of specific investigation conducted by the NSPU/R&amp;I customs authorities, and hence the appellants CB cannot be found fault for the reason that they did not advise their client importer to comply with the provisions of the Act. - The Tribunal held that, the procedure outlined in Regulation 17 for revoking a license or imposing a penalty was not followed correctly, particularly regarding the opportunity for cross-examination. </description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>