Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Addition u/s 68 - Addition as income of brokerage/commission @ 2% of cash deposits as accommodation entry provider - onus to prove - The High Court concluded that the respondent had disclosed complete details of the bank accounts and transactions, and the income was correctly determined as brokerage/commission on the cash deposits. - The peak credit adopted by the ITAT to determine income of the assessee does not require interference. - The order of ITAT deleting the additions confirmed.
Addition u/s 68 - Addition as income of brokerage/commission @ 2% of cash deposits as accommodation entry provider - onus to prove - The High Court concluded that the respondent had disclosed complete details of the bank accounts and transactions, and the income was correctly determined as brokerage/commission on the cash deposits. - The peak credit adopted by the ITAT to determine income of the assessee does not require interference. - The order of ITAT deleting the additions confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.