Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Addition u/s 68 - Addition as income of brokerage/commission @ 2% of cash deposits as accommodation entry provider - onus to prove - The High Court concluded that the respondent had disclosed complete details of the bank accounts and transactions, and the income was correctly determined as brokerage/commission on the cash deposits. - The peak credit adopted by the ITAT to determine income of the assessee does not require interference. - The order of ITAT deleting the additions confirmed.
Addition u/s 68 - Addition as income of brokerage/commission @ 2% of cash deposits as accommodation entry provider - onus to prove - The High Court concluded that the respondent had disclosed complete details of the bank accounts and transactions, and the income was correctly determined as brokerage/commission on the cash deposits. - The peak credit adopted by the ITAT to determine income of the assessee does not require interference. - The order of ITAT deleting the additions confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.