Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revision u/s 263 against non-Est order - The ITAT held that, return filed beyond the prescribed time limit under notice u/s 148 should not be treated as non-est. - However, the Tribunal held that, the order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) in the present case was invalid on account of non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) by the Ld. AO which is an accepted fact discernible from the order of Ld. PCIT, wherein it has been impliedly observed that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued, stating that the issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is not required. - Consequently, the revisionary proceedings initiated u/s 263 are without appropriate jurisdiction with the Ld. PCIT, since, the same cannot be invoked on the foundation of an invalid/ void ab initio assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.