Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Import of foods of Malaysian origin - Benefit of Exemption under Preferential Trade Agreement - failure to prove the condition of qualifying value content of the goods should not be less than 35% of the FOB value - cost structure on the basis of data privacy was not provided - onus of prove shifts to Department (shifting burden) - The Tribunal held that the burden of proof was unfairly placed on the appellant despite documentary evidence and government-to-government verification. - Failure of Indian authorities to get more detailed verification or underlying cost data from the Malaysian Government authorities cannot be held against the appellant. - Benefit of concessional rate of Customs Duty allowed.
Import of foods of Malaysian origin - Benefit of Exemption under Preferential Trade Agreement - failure to prove the condition of qualifying value content of the goods should not be less than 35% of the FOB value - cost structure on the basis of data privacy was not provided - onus of prove shifts to Department (shifting burden) - The Tribunal held that the burden of proof was unfairly placed on the appellant despite documentary evidence and government-to-government verification. - Failure of Indian authorities to get more detailed verification or underlying cost data from the Malaysian Government authorities cannot be held against the appellant. - Benefit of concessional rate of Customs Duty allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.