<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Wins: Tribunal Grants Concessional Duty Rate on Malaysian Foods Due to Unfair Burden of Proof in Trade Agreement Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74921</link>
    <description>Import of foods of Malaysian origin - Benefit of Exemption under Preferential Trade Agreement - failure to prove the condition of qualifying value content of the goods should not be less than 35% of the FOB value - cost structure on the basis of data privacy was not provided - onus of prove shifts to Department (shifting burden) - The Tribunal held that the burden of proof was unfairly placed on the appellant despite documentary evidence and government-to-government verification. - Failure of Indian authorities to get more detailed verification or underlying cost data from the Malaysian Government authorities cannot be held against the appellant. - Benefit of concessional rate of Customs Duty allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Wins: Tribunal Grants Concessional Duty Rate on Malaysian Foods Due to Unfair Burden of Proof in Trade Agreement Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74921</link>
      <description>Import of foods of Malaysian origin - Benefit of Exemption under Preferential Trade Agreement - failure to prove the condition of qualifying value content of the goods should not be less than 35% of the FOB value - cost structure on the basis of data privacy was not provided - onus of prove shifts to Department (shifting burden) - The Tribunal held that the burden of proof was unfairly placed on the appellant despite documentary evidence and government-to-government verification. - Failure of Indian authorities to get more detailed verification or underlying cost data from the Malaysian Government authorities cannot be held against the appellant. - Benefit of concessional rate of Customs Duty allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>