Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 15, 2024Case LawsAT
Inclusion of the Appellant in the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and also to provide voting rights to the Applicant/ Appellant - The appellant, a foreign financial lender, extended loans to the Corporate Debtor - Appellant is a related party of the Corporate Debtor or not - The NCLAT found no substantial evidence that the Corporate Debtor acted on the appellant's advice, directions, or instructions as required under Section 5(24)(h). The actions of Rembert Biemond as a director of the Corporate Debtor could not be construed as directions from the appellant. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order, allowing the appellant's inclusion in the CoC with proportionate voting rights, based on the admitted claim amount in the CIRP.
Inclusion of the Appellant in the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and also to provide voting rights to the Applicant/ Appellant - The appellant, a foreign financial lender, extended loans to the Corporate Debtor - Appellant is a related party of the Corporate Debtor or not - The NCLAT found no substantial evidence that the Corporate Debtor acted on the appellant's advice, directions, or instructions as required under Section 5(24)(h). The actions of Rembert Biemond as a director of the Corporate Debtor could not be construed as directions from the appellant. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order, allowing the appellant's inclusion in the CoC with proportionate voting rights, based on the admitted claim amount in the CIRP.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
