<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Foreign Lender Gains Inclusion and Voting Rights in Corporate Debtor&#039;s Committee of Creditors After NCLAT Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74918</link>
    <description>Inclusion of the Appellant in the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and also to provide voting rights to the Applicant/ Appellant - The appellant, a foreign financial lender, extended loans to the Corporate Debtor - Appellant is a related party of the Corporate Debtor or not - The NCLAT found no substantial evidence that the Corporate Debtor acted on the appellant&#039;s advice, directions, or instructions as required under Section 5(24)(h). The actions of Rembert Biemond as a director of the Corporate Debtor could not be construed as directions from the appellant. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, allowing the appellant&#039;s inclusion in the CoC with proportionate voting rights, based on the admitted claim amount in the CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Foreign Lender Gains Inclusion and Voting Rights in Corporate Debtor&#039;s Committee of Creditors After NCLAT Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74918</link>
      <description>Inclusion of the Appellant in the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and also to provide voting rights to the Applicant/ Appellant - The appellant, a foreign financial lender, extended loans to the Corporate Debtor - Appellant is a related party of the Corporate Debtor or not - The NCLAT found no substantial evidence that the Corporate Debtor acted on the appellant&#039;s advice, directions, or instructions as required under Section 5(24)(h). The actions of Rembert Biemond as a director of the Corporate Debtor could not be construed as directions from the appellant. - The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, allowing the appellant&#039;s inclusion in the CoC with proportionate voting rights, based on the admitted claim amount in the CIRP.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>