Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 15, 2024Case LawsAT
Scope of duty of RP - Seeking acceptance of the claims which had been rejected by the Resolution Professional - Proof of services provided and debts - The NCLAT held that the RP did not exceed his powers by seeking additional proof to substantiate the claims. The RP's role includes verifying claims to ensure their accuracy for the CIRP process, and the request for additional proof was within his administrative powers, not constituting adjudication. - The Tribunal found that the RP acted within his mandate by seeking further evidence to ensure the credibility of the insolvency process.
Scope of duty of RP - Seeking acceptance of the claims which had been rejected by the Resolution Professional - Proof of services provided and debts - The NCLAT held that the RP did not exceed his powers by seeking additional proof to substantiate the claims. The RP's role includes verifying claims to ensure their accuracy for the CIRP process, and the request for additional proof was within his administrative powers, not constituting adjudication. - The Tribunal found that the RP acted within his mandate by seeking further evidence to ensure the credibility of the insolvency process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
