<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Resolution Professional&#039;s Authority Affirmed: NCLAT Supports Request for Additional Proof in Insolvency Claims Verification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74917</link>
    <description>Scope of duty of RP - Seeking acceptance of the claims which had been rejected by the Resolution Professional - Proof of services provided and debts - The NCLAT held that the RP did not exceed his powers by seeking additional proof to substantiate the claims. The RP&#039;s role includes verifying claims to ensure their accuracy for the CIRP process, and the request for additional proof was within his administrative powers, not constituting adjudication. - The Tribunal found that the RP acted within his mandate by seeking further evidence to ensure the credibility of the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Resolution Professional&#039;s Authority Affirmed: NCLAT Supports Request for Additional Proof in Insolvency Claims Verification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74917</link>
      <description>Scope of duty of RP - Seeking acceptance of the claims which had been rejected by the Resolution Professional - Proof of services provided and debts - The NCLAT held that the RP did not exceed his powers by seeking additional proof to substantiate the claims. The RP&#039;s role includes verifying claims to ensure their accuracy for the CIRP process, and the request for additional proof was within his administrative powers, not constituting adjudication. - The Tribunal found that the RP acted within his mandate by seeking further evidence to ensure the credibility of the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>