Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Inverted duty structure refunds require proof that cotton yarn was manufactured rather than merely traded before eligibility is determined.
    Reliance on Quashed GST Circular Requires Fresh Examination of Inverted-Duty Refund Eligibility for Cotton-Yarn Clearances.
    Transitional input tax credit claims may use extended filing and revision facility, subject to merits verification.
    Statutory personal hearing requirements invalidate unreasoned GST demands based solely on duplicate e-way bills and require fresh adjudication.
    Reasoned Appellate Orders Require Consideration of Grounds, with Remand for Effective Hearing and Fresh Adjudication
    Common portal service of GST notices may not establish effective notice, permitting writ relief against limitation dismissal.
    Parallel GST proceedings require identical subject matter; distinct ITC allegations, adequate hearing notices, and supplier-payment conditions remain ...
    Curable GST registration non-compliance permits restoration consideration where bank details are corrected and statutory dues are cleared.
    Procedural validity of GST assessment order defeats challenge despite zero-rated supply refund claim and related interest and penalty demands.
    E-way bill Part-B omissions require proven tax-evasion intent, while missing MOV-09 orders vitiate detention penalties.
    Expired e-way bill penalties require tax-evasion context; clerical PIN-code errors without evasive intent should not trigger detention.
    E-way bill Part-B omissions require evidence of tax-evasion intent before detention penalties can be sustained.
    GSTR-2A mismatch requires transaction-level proof of input tax credit; cross-head set-off and unsupported remand requests fail.
    Additional court fees on GST first appeals remain payable, but non-payment dismissal was set aside for merits review.
    Interlocutory relief requires a registered appeal, while urgent cases may receive expedited scrutiny before substantive hearing.
    Input tax credit cannot be denied without transaction-specific proof of sham supplies despite retrospective supplier registration cancellation.
    Reasoned appellate GST orders require consideration of material grounds, precedents, and procedural fairness before confirming tax demands.
    Zero-rated turnover includes export invoices issued during the refund period when goods are subsequently exported from India.
    Reasoned discretion in tax-demand stays requires merits-based consideration, preventing mechanical rejection for pending appeals or circular-payment d...
    Review jurisdiction bars rehearing of unexplained bank-credit disputes where public-record evidence was available and due diligence was absent.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Offence punishable u/s 276C(2) r.w.s. 278B of the Income Tax Act...

Tax Evasion Case Quashed: Court Rules No Intentional Delay After Quick Payment Following Notice.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax February 8, 2024 Case Laws HC
Offence punishable u/s 276C(2) r.w.s. 278B of the Income Tax Act - Delay of 8 years in payment of tax - willful attempt to evade the tax or not? - Tax liability declared in the ITR as self-assessment but the tax and interest were not paid - The High Court observed that, The action on the part of the applicants to pay the tax due under five days of the notice militates against the stand of the Income Tax Department that there was an intent to evade the tax throughout. - Consequently, the HC held that in the facts of the case the continuation of the prosecution for the offence punishable u/s 276C(2) amounts to abuse of the process of the Court - Prosecution proceedings quashed and set aside.

Topics

Acts Income Tax