Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.
Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
