<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Grants Exemption for Re-Export Goods Under Notification 94/2006-Cus, Validating Eligibility at Import Time.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74687</link>
    <description>Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:14:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=742697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Grants Exemption for Re-Export Goods Under Notification 94/2006-Cus, Validating Eligibility at Import Time.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74687</link>
      <description>Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:14:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>