Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.
Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Change of Notification in the bill of entry - alternate exemption Notification - The Tribunal held that, the only criteria to be seen that whether at the time of import the alternate exemption notification was legally available to the appellant - In the facts of the present case, there is no dispute about eligibility of the Notification 94/2006-Cus in respect of the import made by the appellant as the goods were meant for re-export. - Further, by following the decision of Supreme Court, wherein it was held that the beneficial notification can be claimed at a later stage also, if otherwise the same is eligible at the time of import of goods, the CESTAT allowed the claim of the Importer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
